Allowing voters to rank candidates in order of preference aims to reduce spoilers and incentivize coalition-building. Critics cite complexity and voter confusion.
Pros:
It can eliminate “spoiler” effects and ensure majority support.
It encourages candidates to seek broader appeal.
It reduces negative, attack-style campaigning.
Cons:
Ballots and counting procedures become more complex.
Voter education and trust in results may lag.
Smaller parties fear dilution of their base support.
Conclusion: Ranked-choice voting promotes majority consensus but must be paired with strong voter outreach.