Open Debate
66% 40
21% 13
  • 40
  • 61
  • 92

Opinions

Statistics

  • Yes
  • 40
  • No
  • 13
  • Undecided
  • 8
A government-run plan would cover all Americans, replacing private insurers. Advocates cite universal access; critics warn of higher taxes and bureaucratic inefficiencies.

Pros:
  • It guarantees health coverage regardless of income or job status.
  • It simplifies insurance bureaucracy and administrative costs.
  • It leverages government bargaining power to lower drug prices.

Cons:
  • It would require significant tax increases to fund care.
  • Potential for longer wait times and limited provider choice.
  • Transition risks disrupting existing employer-based plans.

 Conclusion: Single-payer can expand access and reduce overhead but must tackle funding and transition hurdles.
66%
21%
13%